Princess Diana "Cover Up"

[Nandee]

Nicholas Davis, Diana's former friend, makes shocking allegations in his new released book ?Cover Up?.

He claims that Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana were killed by the British and French security services, because Diana was about to give her support to Palestine, which could have outraged neighboring Israel and worsened the Middle East crisis.

Davis quotes a high placed source at M15, who has told him that the car crash in 1997 was 'no accident'.


Apparently, the crash was orchestrated by a team of M15 agents and DST (the French equivalent ? La Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire).

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Princess-Diana-Was-Murdered-Because-She-Was-About-To-Give-Her-Support-To-Palestine-11073.shtml

[sparkie]

Diana Murder Coverup Turns Deadly

By Jeffrey Steinberg
Executive Intelligence Review - July 7, 2000
7-3-00


"Nearly three years after the Paris car crash that claimed the lives of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, the cover-up of that tragedy has taken a deadly turn, prompting some experts to recall the pileup of corpses that followed the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Over the course of four years, after President Kennedy was shot on Nov. 22, 1963, at least 37 eyewitnesses and other sources of evidence about the crime, including one member of the infamous Warren Commission, which oversaw the cover-up, died under mysterious circumstances.

On May 5, 2000, police in the south of France found a badly burned body inside the wreckage of a car, deep in the woods near Nantes. The body was so charred that it took police nearly a month before DNA tests confirmed that the dead man was Jean-Paul "James" Andanson, a 54-year-old millionaire photographer, who was among the paparazzi stalking Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed during the week before their deaths.

From the day of the fatal crash in the Place de l'Alma tunnel, that killed Diana, Dodi, and driver Henri Paul, and severely injured bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones"....(Click link below to reaad remainder of article).

Source-Rense.com, Link: http://www.rense.com/general2/dian.htm

[NicoMoon]

Yes, this is a really sticky one! All things considered, it does seem as though it very well could have been deliberately caused. Diana was certainly giving the royal family a run for their money, and that gang have hearts of stone if you ask me. They are so out of touch, spoiled, arrogant, and desperate to maintain the public support for the royalty that nothing would surprise me.

What really bugs me the most about the whole situation is that they didn't just tell young Diana what she was in for from the beginning and let her make her choice about having a marriage in name only and all the side perks that came with it. I'm really sure that she had no clue what she was getting into, and the shock and confusion that resulted is really the cause of all this huge mess.

I really believe that Diana was punished for being human from day one, irregardless of whether or not she was deliberately killed, she was still screwed from the beginning.:mad:

Yuck! I just can't stand those royals!! This is another one that we'll never get to the bottom of. People will be speculating about this for years to come too, I'm quite sure.

[sparkie]

Sure would seem to be an easy argument to win that if you can only pick the next King from a very small pool of applicants, sometimes one, then how the heck can you pick the best man for the job?

What, people never have an idiot son?